TL;DR
Get garage and car supplies delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Four speed cameras recorded about 100,000 potential speeding infractions during a 10-day trial in Malibu, according to the city’s figures reported by The Drive. The city postponed the planned start of its warning period while it studies traffic patterns in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon. No warnings or citations were issued during the trial.
Malibu has delayed the warning period for a planned speed-camera pilot after four cameras recorded about 100,000 potential speeding infractions during a 10-day September trial, according to reporting by The Drive and KTLA. The city said it will study traffic patterns in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon before moving ahead; no warnings or citations were issued during the trial.
The cameras were operating during the trial and drivers may have seen them flash, but the system was not enforcing speed limits. Malibu said the cameras were not issuing warnings or citations, accessing driver information from the Department of Motor Vehicles, or taking enforcement action. The recorded readings are therefore not tickets, and the city has said trial participants will not be charged for speeding based on them.
City officials said the four cameras captured most of the recorded violations in eastern Malibu. The city stretches along Pacific Coast Highway, which is the main focus of the planned enforcement effort. Officials have not released a breakdown of the readings by location, speed, or time of day in the source reporting.
If the program proceeds, enforcement would begin at 11 mph over the posted limit, with penalties increasing according to the amount over the limit: $50 for 11 to 15 mph over, $100 for 16 to 25 mph over, and $200 for 26 mph or more over. The listed penalty for speeds of 100 mph or more is $500. The city newsletter said the program would not add license points or insurance penalties. Those rules concern the planned system, not the non-enforcement trial.
Why Malibu Paused the Rollout
The trial’s large number of readings has prompted the city to review road conditions before it begins a program that could lead to financial penalties for drivers. Studying traffic patterns first may help officials determine whether the recorded speeds reflect consistent speeding, specific roadway conditions, or a need to adjust installation and program details. The available reporting does not establish which explanation accounts for the readings.
The decision also affects drivers who use the targeted roads: the planned warning phase will not start on the original schedule, and the city has not announced a replacement date. The city has said that program revenue would go toward system costs and Pacific Coast Highway safety activity, with performance and data reported to the Public Safety Commission and the public. That makes the eventual rollout, its penalty structure, and public reporting relevant to both road safety and accountability.
car dash camera with wide-angle lens
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Trial Readings to Enforcement
Malibu’s pilot was scheduled to move from a camera trial into a warning period before enforcement began. After the September test, the city delayed that next phase to study traffic in Carbon Canyon and Tuna Canyon, citing the need to assess existing patterns and make necessary installation changes. The Drive reported that the program had been expected to be implemented in the fall.
The city described the project as a road-safety measure focused mainly on Pacific Coast Highway. In a September newsletter, it said privacy protections would apply and that the cameras would record only when a speed violation was detected. The city also said it would regularly report program performance and data to the Public Safety Commission and the public. The reported trial total is a count of recorded potential infractions, not a count of unique drivers or a measure of how many citations would eventually be issued.
“The cameras are not currently issuing warnings or citations, accessing driver information from the DMV, or taking enforcement action.”
— City of Malibu, in a statement reported by KTLA
What the Trial Numbers Cannot Show
The reported total of about 100,000 readings over 10 days does not show how many individual vehicles were involved, how often the same vehicle may have been recorded, or how far above the limit drivers were traveling. A detailed location-by-location and speed-range breakdown was not included in the source material. The comparison basis for the total, such as traffic volume or a longer-term baseline, is also not provided, so the figure alone cannot establish how representative the trial was.
It is also unclear when the warning period will begin, how long it will last, or whether the city will change camera placement or other parts of the planned program after its review. The eventual number of warnings or citations cannot be inferred from the trial readings, which were collected without enforcement action.
City Studies Roads Before Warnings
Malibu says it will continue its traffic studies and installation changes before starting the warning phase. The city has not provided a revised start date in the reporting cited here. Drivers should watch for updates from the city, particularly any announcement setting a new schedule or explaining changes to camera locations and enforcement procedures.
If the pilot moves into operation, the city has said it will report program performance and data to the Public Safety Commission and the public. Those reports could clarify where readings are recorded, how the system is used, and whether the program is meeting its stated road-safety aims.
Key Questions
Were drivers fined during the 10-day trial?
No. Malibu said the cameras were not issuing warnings or citations and were not taking enforcement action during the trial.
How many cameras recorded the trial readings?
Four cameras recorded about 100,000 potential speeding infractions over 10 days, according to the figures reported by The Drive.
Where were most of the recorded violations?
Malibu officials said most were recorded in eastern Malibu. The reporting does not provide a detailed count for individual roads or cameras.
What penalties are planned if the system begins enforcement?
The planned schedule starts at $50 for driving 11 to 15 mph over the limit, rising to $100 for 16 to 25 mph over and $200 for 26 mph or more over. The city lists a $500 penalty for speeds of 100 mph or more. It has said the program would not add license points or insurance penalties.
When will the warning period begin?
No new start date has been reported. The city postponed the warning period while it studies traffic patterns and completes installation changes.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
